U.S. Steel plans to lay off more than 1,000 workers in the Detroit area as it begins idling next spring what it termed a significant portion of its Great Lakes Works in Ecorse and River Rouge.
By the end of 2020 the company said the hot strip mill rolling facility will be idled.
The Pittsburgh-based company said production now done at Great Lakes Works will shift to a plant in Gary, Indiana.
The idling will result in layoffs for 1,545 workers U.S. Steel said of the move, which it framed as a response to market demand.
In a news release, U.S. Steel said no employees at the Zug Island plant will lose their jobs before next April.
The news release said the final number of layoffs at Great Lakes Works might be lower than 1,545 because some operations will continue.
These include the pickle line, cold mill, sheet temper mill, continuous galvanizing line, annealing and warehouses.
“Transitioning production currently at Great Lakes Works to Gary Works will enable increased efficiency in the use of our assets, improve our ability to meet our customers’ needs for sustainable steel solutions and will help our company get to our future state faster,” said David Burritt, president and CEO of U.S. Steel, said in a statement.
The statement said the company took into account current market conditions and the long-term outlook for the Great Lakes Works.
The latest move is the second time that production at the Great Lakes Works has been curtailed.
Last August the company announced it was temporarily laying off 200 workers due to idling a furnace due to reduced consumer demand and market conditions.
Crain’s Detroit Business reported that the impact of tariffs imposed by the Trump Administration on Chinese steel imports two years ago may have contributed to the decision to idle the Great Lake Works.
The magazine said U.S. Steel ramped up production at a time when the global economy was cooling and that undercut demand and led to lower prices for steel.
Industry observers have noted that U.S. Steel has older production facilities that are less efficient than those of rival steel companies that use mini mill production.
U.S. Steel has had a series of different strategies in the past two years, leading some to “raise concerns that there’s no long-term, overriding execution capability to improve competitiveness,” wrote Richard Bourke, a senior credit analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, in a note to investors. “Cash costs from layoffs will likely exceed savings from the cuts, in our view.”
Bloomberg reported that the price of domestic steel is down about 40 percent from its 2018 high, which it reached a few weeks after the tariffs were imposed.
U.S. Steel shares have fallen in value this year by a about a third, hitting their lowest levels since October 2016.
Bloomberg said the company expects to report a 98 percent drop in profits for 2019.
The idling of the Great Lakes Works has raised questions about how well U.S. Steel will be able to supply steel for automotive industry parts after it moves production from Detroit to Indiana.
“They just idled their main automotive mill,” said Dan DeMare, a regional sales manager for Heidtman Steel, a Toledo, Ohio-based steel distributor. “They have bet everything on their commercial ability to be viable and offer the cost to market that’s required, and they’re going to have facilities, equipment and a plan to execute. They’ve failed miserably at that so far.”
In an interview with Bloomberg Television, U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross contended that the idling of the Great Lake Works plant doesn’t mean that the steel tariffs aren’t working.
Ross argued that U.S. Steel suffers from high costs and that many of those losing their jobs will be able to find work at nearby General Motors and Ford Motor plants.