Organizations have ways of forcing people to do something they might not wish to do otherwise.
It used to be that airlines issued paper tickets to passengers. They still do, but for a fee.
In theory customers get the “convenience” of being able to print their tickets at home. That saves them a trip to the airport or a travel agent.
To many people, printing your own tickets is no big deal. The cost of the paper and ink for printing airline tickets – technically called boarding passes – is minuscule.
Most people who travel by air already have computers and printers at home.
Some don’t even print their boarding passes. They show a code on their smart phone sent to them electronically. No paper is involved at any step of the process.
But not everyone who still makes photographic images on film has the equipment needed to digitize their work.
Those photographers might be out of luck if they wish to enter the 2017 Trains magazine photo contest.
Tucked into the rules is this change: “We will no longer be accepting submissions by mail.”
No explanation for that rule change was provided, but it likely wasn’t a financial move.
The photographer paid all costs associated with sending slides or printed images by mail.
More than likely this rule change was for the convenience of the staff. All entries can now be kept in one location and viewed in the same manner.
There is no more having to toggle between digital entries and slides and prints.
It also might save some staff time. Winning entries submitted as slides or prints no longer need to be digitized.
But what is convenient for the magazine staff is not so convenient for certain photographs. If they lack the equipment to digitize the images they wish to submit to the contest, they will have to buy the equipment or pay to have their images digitized.
Perhaps some have a friend who has a scanner who might be willing to do it for a beer.
The rule change also is likely a reflection of the reality that few entries are still being submitted the old fashioned way.
There remains a hard core of photographers who use film to make railroad images.
Some of them have scanning equipment to digitize their images, but most of the film guys I know do not have equipment to scan slides and negatives.
Most of them strike me as unwilling to learn how to do it. I can understand why.
Like cameras, film scanners come in all shapes, sizes and price points.
Some equipment is inexpensive, but the quality of the finished product might not be satisfactory.
B&H Photo offers a guide to scanning equipment at https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/buying-guide/film-scanners
If you know little to nothing about digital images, reading that guide might be bewildering. You soon learn you need to know about things that film photographers do not need to know unless they are in the publication business.
I can’t say what percentage of photographers has equipment capable of scanning film images into a digital format.
Most of the railroad images I’ve see posted online were made with a digital camera.
There are not as many pre-digital images in cyberspace as there could be. Aside from its cost, digitizing equipment takes time to learn to use.
Yet the day is coming when having scanning equipment will be a “must have” if you wish to share your pre-digital photographs with others.
Slide shows remain a staple of local railroad clubs, but some events, e.g., Summerail, no longer allow programs in which images are projected directly from film.
I have a sizable collection of slides and I do not foresee projecting them again with a slide projector.
Local railroad clubs are losing members and the number of opportunities to project slides the old fashioned way is dwindling even as slide film is making a modest comeback.
As I noted in a previous column, slide film has a future, but it is tied into the digital world, particularly if you want to share your images with a circle that extends beyond your closest friends who are willing to get together in a room for a slide showing.